When parents cannot afford the time to accompany with their children, they could choose to send their children to the child-care centre where many children have cared together; or they could send their children to an individual caregiver. Which one is better?
Facing the increasing tasks in today’s society, many parents, especially those who have their own jobs and careers, hardly afford the time to accompany with their children. Luckily, there are at least two options for them, which are sending kids to child-centred and to an individual caregiver. Some parents may think the individual caregivers are more reliable because they only take responsibility for one or two kids. According to my perspective, however, the child-care centre will definitely own more advantages.
First and foremost, staying in child-centre which is a public place can guarantee children’s safety to some extent. There are more than one teachers and instructors in child-centre to take care of young kids, which can prevent them from accidents effectively. In contrast, staying in a relatively private room at home without parents, it is hard to say what would happen to the caregiver’s company. As an old saying goes that “We can live with an intention to harm others but without a cautious mind.” We have to protect our babies from any potential evil. Thus, I think under the supervision of others, kids can get away from dangers in the child-centre.
Furthermore, kids will more enjoy in the child-centre with a lot of people rather than stay with one person all the time. As we all know, child-centre may have different and various activities every day for children to have fun. Since the innate for kids is having fun, they will be happy for attending those activities. However, one single caregiver may not come up with new ideas and thoughts to change games frequently. In that case, children will gradually feel tedious and boring to repeat some actives time and time again. Therefore, in order to give children more opportunities to enjoy their childhood, parents should send them to child-centre.
Last but not least, getting along with others in child-centre helps kids foster the communication ability from a young age. Kids have to communicate and interact with several teachers and numerous other peers in the child-centre every day, which is the most efficient method to practice their speaking and communication skills. By meeting and making friends with people with different characteristics and personalities, children will deeply understand how to build and keep relationships with others.
In conclusion, sending kids to child-centre owns some benefits that cannot gain from the individual caregivers. Parents are peaky when it comes children’s education. I strongly believe it is a wise decision if they choose the child-care.
- People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's necessary to put a lot of money into a business to make it successful. 71
- 15 The key to solving environmental problem is simple present generation are willing to accept a less comfortable life for the sake of the future generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one teacher', 'a teacher', or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: one teacher; a teacher; teachers
...ety to some extent. There are more than one teachers and instructors in child-centre to take...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, at least, i think, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32929782082 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06992192339 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5163538748 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.80952381 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377866368765 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111353465203 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659617352237 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231645304441 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820711750709 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.