Which one do you think has the greatest impact on protecting the environment? Government regulation, organizations, or individual efforts.
It is no doubt that nowadays people put more emphasis on protecting the environment. However, we don’t have an agreement regarding who should lead people to protect the environment. Should the government set it a rule requiring people to follow certain rules? Do organizations or individual efforts provide a better result? From my perspective, the government has the greatest impact on protecting the environment.
In the first place, only government is able to provide facilities necessary for protecting the environment. With the proper facility, it is possible for people to change their original behave. For example, twenty years ago, our mayor began to set up beautiful recycle bins in every park and encouraged people to reduce the amount of the garbage by recycling them in those bins. People found them interesting so soon after the bins were set, recycle became a well-adapted concept. Nevertheless, organizations and individual efforts do not have the power to provide and set the facilities. As a result, they do not make impacts like the government does.
In addition, only government has the power to provide various educational programs to the public regarding protecting the environment. To be more specific, the government can ask schools to teach kids about protecting the earth. Also, it can increase the awareness of protecting the environment by posting notices on TV or on road signs. In contrast, although organizations can also provide educational programs, they have limited resources and outreach to thrive their programs. Not to mention, an individual is not capable of conducting big educational projects. Consequently, the government makes the greatest impact because it is able to provide numerous educational programs to a wide range of people.
Last but not least, the government has the authority to make it a rule and force people to follow the rules. For example, to reduce the amount of plastic bags which harm the environment, our government prohibits stores from giving free plastic bags. People have to pay to get the plastic bags. Furthermore, if anyone breaks the law, the person will be fined with a big penalty. The policy works well and many people bring their fabric bags to shop now. However, organizations and individuals have no such authority to influence people.
In conclusion, I believe the government has the greatest power to influence people to protect the environment. It is able to provide necessary facilities and education to the public in order to increase the awareness. Moreover, it owns the power to force people to follow the policy to protect the Earth. Neither organization nor individual can achieve them.
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
- Essay topics: TPO-49 - Integrated Writing TaskLike many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found th 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Playing sports teaches people important lessons in their life. 70
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: BE_FINED_WITH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fine'?
Suggestion: fine
...yone breaks the law, the person will be fined with a big penalty. The policy works we...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25174825175 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99599187443 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475524475524 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1606580652 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4444444444 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.51851851852 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197487002071 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619782363386 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589240911087 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121382954797 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383821942486 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.