Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics

Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In recent decades, the rate of employee retention has become more and more important to many employers as they realize how much time and effort it would save the company from excessive training process. As for how to keep employees satisfied with their job, some employers insist workers would prefer go through different tasks on a workday, while others believe they feel happier doing the same tasks everyday. I’m in favor of the second belief.

First of all, giving workers many types of work can actually cause more harm than good to their job satisfaction. In fact, when job applicants looks through job descriptions, they choose ones where they are expected to do what they have been trained for at university of vocational school. For example, a prospective teacher would expect her job to require planning and giving lessons to students on a daily basis. This is how majors and specializations give people expectations of their future jobs. By assigning hired people to various tasks in their working hours, managers are more likely to make them feel overwhelmed rather than satisfied with how their work flow goes. Consequently, employees can’t fully pay attention to any of the tasks, which only deteriorates their productivity and efficiency at work.

On the other hand, there are several reasons why workers can still get more satisfied and contented even if they are doing the same tasks every day. Handling a same set of work all day long for a certain period of time, workers will surely find it easier to do their job as they are already accustomed to it. As a result, these workers are able to do all of their work faster, which might enable them to wrap up their workday in happiness as all the work have been completed. Moreover, gaining experience on doing familiar tasks also helps employees to tackle their job better than those who only get to deal with them a few time. Not only can they be satisfied for mastering their position but they can also obtain more happiness from helping colleagues who are having trouble doing the tasks.

In conclusion, although having the same kind of tasks every day sounds like a tedious and monotonous work life, it is much more beneficial in reality when we consider how productive and efficient one can get at their job. It is true as the saying goes ‘Jack of all trades is master of none’.

Votes

Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: iPass

>>> more users practiced this essay topic. Check them out >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by the user:

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... they feel happier doing the same tasks everyday. I’m in favor of the second belief. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... set of work all day long for a certain period of time, workers will surely find it easier to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
... those who only get to deal with them a few time. Not only can they be satisfied for mas...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83251231527 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50528331053 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6871389589 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.375 5.45110844103 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317097702621 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106144171244 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818785764251 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199370528959 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638235630138 0.0645574589148 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.