You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group. Do you think a person's honest is the most important characteristic for being a leader?
In school life, sometimes we have to choose a student as a group leader, and what types of the student have to choose is the most difficult question. Some people believe that honesty is the most important when they select a leader, while others think of creativity and social abilities as important qualities as well. I hold the opinion that there are other important qualities that have to consider as well when we choose a leader.
Admittedly, an honest person can strengthen relationships between groups. Honest one affects people with honesty, so people in the group trust each other. Similarly, under the leadership of an honest person, people develop closer friendships and become intimate. Also, teachers and staff in the school can trust the honest leader. Sometimes, school groups or organizations need to raise funds. For instance, most clubs in the school launched fundraising for organizing the event on the Sports Day. Meanwhile, if club leaders were dishonest, they would use this opportunity to line their pockets. It is obvious that the honest leader improves friendships in the group and lets the group possess an excellent reputation.
However, creativity and social skills are crucial qualities that have to take into account when we choose a leader. A creative leader can come up with a new idea for the group like organizing a new party, or activity. Furthermore, if the leaders are good at socializing, they will be able to forge great relationships with other organizations and groups. In other words, the groups have more opportunities to corporate with other groups. This will not only increase the reputation of the groups but also help the groups have more opportunities to raise funds. Take my personal experience as a compelling example of this. Thanks to my club leader, who is an easygoing and friendly person, we often cooperated with other big-and-populous clubs, so our club was well-known as well despite being small. Two years ago, my club launched fundraising, and we ended up receiving a big fortune. Therefore, choosing a leader with creativity and social ability is crucial to the groups and organizations.
To sum up, even though honesty is important for people to choose a leader in a group and organization, creativity and social skills are also crucial. This is because choosing a leader with creativity and social abilities has positive effects on the groups and organizations. Hence, I consider that except honesty, there are other important qualities that have to take into account when we choose a leader.
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 76
- Scandal are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 720, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... group possess an excellent reputation. However, creativity and social skills ar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86897967752 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461722488038 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6267815013 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.347826087 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1739130435 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314066716207 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995096653284 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517814632009 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209004312667 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281746202645 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.