One cannot deny the fact that certain characteristics of a person play a crucial role when giving a responsibility to handle the whole company. Different people have different opinions for a person who would give the opportunity to teach others. Some argue that experience person can always teach well to others. However, others may carry a different idea. From my perspective, experience person would be the best person who can teach others without creating any trouble in the surrounding. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
Primarily, although education and quality of the previous experience is an important consideration, that is not enough. Education and learning a book can provide theoretical knowledge but they cannot acquire real experience by learning books. Similarly, the quality of the previous experience in a different field does not prepare that person to teach a particular job. To illustrate this more, when a person starts a job in the coffee shop, he would require taking specific hours of internship. In such a scenario, mostly other best employee gives him practical training since that employee is having an experience in the same coffee shop for a long time. This is widely accepted that a person with great experience would be the choice to teach others at the workplace.
Furthermore, a person with more experience in the job has the necessary ability and exposure since he has faced many situations while performing the task in the company. Hence, vast experience as a senior person and ability to work efficiently make his recognized by others for his mastery. This would certainly be greatly advantageous for him to be accepted by others as a person who knows best among other employees in the company. Therefore, he would have faced fewer difficulties in training others.
Moreover, having real practical experience is a perfect quality for someone since a person would have been working in the same place, and he knows the company from a different aspect. It would be easier for him to teach others what he knows, and also, he can make aware of the obstacles that a new employee might face in the initial stage. This way, a company make sure that a new employee would not make any mistakes as he was already aware of it.
All in all, I strongly believe that the best person to teach skill should have a long time of experience in the same field. People who have achieved well in the past know how to apply their skill practically which will encourage learners to do the same.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo 40 73
- TPO 28 Task 2Do you agree or disagree the following statement: Parents today are involved more in the education of their kids than those in the past. 76
- TPO 30Agree/Disagree: It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 70
- TPO 35- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The “Voynich manuscript,” as it 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91375291375 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73705932403 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473193473193 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5183833466 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.380952381 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299426820939 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10315650167 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612192425857 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18004790351 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597453881128 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.