The reading passage talks about the American literature and early 20th century's influential authors. And tells that the author Gertrude Stein's work is little overrated by the critics. On the other hand, the leturer opposes that opinion and presents reasons to contradict points mentioned in the reading passage.
First, the reading passage portrays that Stein's work lacks with conventional punctuation and her writings are difficult to understand because of the long, unbroken chain of words without commas or period. Whereas, the lecturer disagrees with the point by saying that the author of passage didn't read Stein's prose. The lecturer posits that the punctuation is unnecessary to evaluate a writer's prose skill. And also she feels that it is a unique perspective to consider in Stein's work.
Second, the author of passage claims that Stein's works did not communicate her thoughts cleary and did not convey her emotions in her writings which made her works inaccessible to readers. But, the lecturer posits that the passage author ignores the changes happened in poetry. And she feels that Stein's works are massive literary influence in history. She supports her claim by explaining that highlighted features of Ernest Hemingway such as simple words and expressions were originally influenced from Gertrude Stein's writings.
Finally, the reading passage author thinks that Stein's work is criticized positively because of her social connections and that fact can not give her historical importance in the American literature. The author also insists that one author's work has more weigh than their social connections whereas the lectures denies this fact by positing that the connections alone can not make some one famous.
- "Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain 58
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 54
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University: A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for the 42
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals. Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 58
- "Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell v 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hain of words without commas or period. Whereas, the lecturer disagrees with the point ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nt by saying that the author of passage didnt read Steins prose. The lecturer posits ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a writer' or simply 'writers'?
Suggestion: a writer; writers
... punctuation is unnecessary to evaluate a writers prose skill. And also she feels that it...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...that the connections alone can not make some one famous.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, whereas, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40959409594 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5949382664 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553505535055 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.507249465 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.769230769 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0889529199761 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369568735934 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487314670222 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631173811453 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337750946626 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.