The article and the lecture focus on the problem of building wildlife crossings.
The article and the lecture focus on the problem of building wildlife crossings. The author presents three reasons why these constructions are useless or even harmful to animals. The lecturer, however, provides new conclusions regarding wildlife crossing and challenges the claims made in the reading passage.
The author begins by stating that animals are not able to learn how to use these buildings. Hence, they do not use them that makes wildlife crossings useless. The lecturer rebuts this specific argument and points out that obviously animals will adapt to these constructions and adjust their behavior. As a result, wildlife crossings will save the lives of the creatures that follow these connections.
Secondly, in the article, it is stated that taking into account the assumption that these buildings are useless, construction of them is just wasting money. The lecturer, however, asserts that the additional cost to build wildlife crossings is relatively small compared to the number of lives that will be saved. Moreover, he claims that it will prevent assets and properties from damage caused by a collision between animals and vehicles.
Finally, the author mentions that the construction of the wildlife crossings damages the areas that в свою очередь lead to a decrease in the animal population. The professor is doubtful that this is an accurate conclusion. In contrast, he suggests that these construction reconnect areas and increase animals the access to mates and resources. Thus, it has a positive effect on the animal population.
- online encyclopedia 76
- Both the reading passage and the lecture combine to give a complete understanding of the negative effects of social media 70
- Which is more important for a leader the ability to win an argument about issues or the ability to help others come to an agreement about issues Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The article and the lecture focus on the problem of building wildlife crossings 80
- Blood rain 73
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 245 250
No. of Characters: 1280 1200
No. of Different Words: 135 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.956 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.224 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.675 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.261 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.54 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4