The article and the lecture are both about going green. The author of the reading believes that going green is not only benificial for environment but also for an individual. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that it is hard for an individual to go green without support of multiple people.
According to the reading, going green is beneficial for environment. The author mentions that pollution is reduced by minimizing the amount of waste. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that people prefer cheap products rather than costly ones. Additonally he points out that coffee shop sells coffee in cheap cup material for higher profits.
Secondly, the authgor suggests that companies get more profits by going green. The article notes that going green earns trust of customers as a result, increasing the profits of a company. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that companies make cheaper products for higher profits. He ellobrates on this by mentioning that the customers of any company shows interest in cheaper products rather than costly products.
Finaly, the author posits that people can save money by going green. He contents that going green can reduce costs of many things used in our daily life. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that people would spend for installation of equipment rather than save money for futher. She put forths the idea of how installation of solar panels increases the costs.
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last heating season that regi 78
- Extinction of dinosaurs 78
- Extinction of dinosaurs 78
- TOEFL integrated writing Altruism
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...environment but also for an individual. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10162601626 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50066089486 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0998202539 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.7222222222 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28308909666 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108407903354 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124239585034 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189407897307 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723644201297 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.