There was a theory that the bees existed on Earth from 200 millions years ago, this theory was supported by the discovery of old fossil remains which similar to bee nests. While this structrues were doubted by scientists as it may be not built by bees. In that there were no fossils of bees found. Besides, there were no flowers on which the bees feed 200 million years ago. Also, there were some lacking details of the remains if there were created by bees. However, the lecturer disproves the views mentioned above as follows.
Firstly, the absence of fossils of bees does not mean there was no bee 200 millon years ago. Because, probably, the bees could be be preserved at that time like other spicies. There was no certain fluid to preserve the bees as fossils. So maybe the bees could exist at that time.
Secondly, the bees may eat other plants instead of flowers. It is true that there were no flower 200 million years ago, while the primitive bees may live on plants like ferns or pine trees. After the emergence of flowers, the bees began to feed on them.
Thirdly. There is a supportive evidence that the nests were built by bees. Although there no caps in the remains which the modern nests have, the analyzation of the fossil of structres shows that that there is a kind of water-proofing material similar to the marterial produced by modern bees in the their nests to protect the comb against water.
In conclusion, the according to hte lecturer, the fossils of the structures is convincing to prove the exsitence of bees 200 million years ago.
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 84
- Educators should base their assessment of students' learning not on students' grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas, trends, and concepts that those facts illustrate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or d 50
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine. "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep 59
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling re 50
- The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? Use examples and details in your answer. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
... ago. Because, probably, the bees could be be preserved at that time like other spici...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...zation of the fossil of structres shows that that there is a kind of water-proofing mater...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...he marterial produced by modern bees in the their nests to protect the comb against water...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'proving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: proving
...fossils of the structures is convincing to prove the exsitence of bees 200 million years...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6678700361 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32386123407 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476534296029 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.7956520673 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8125 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381804828719 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132772731344 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133678569073 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222438624194 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102821225833 0.0443174109184 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.