Egyptian pyramids

Essay topics

The reading and the lecture are both about possibles theories to answer the question of how ancient Egyptians lifted block weighing in order to construct the Pyramids of Giza. While the author of the article argues that there are three potential theories, the lecturer disputes the arguments made in the article. His position is these theories do not have enough evidence to prove them.

According to the reading, the first theory is external ramp. The article mentions that this theory proposes a long, straight ramp built outside of the pyramid. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that kind of structure is no very practical since it need thousands of kilometers of long and tall. Additionally, he points out that in the construction of Pyramids of Giza there was not space to have a enormous structure like that. Moreover, He said that external ramp was a huge task since ancient Egyptians did not have resources and capacity to build it.

Secondly, the author suggest that other theory will be the internal ramp. This theory said that block could have been moved upwards using a spiraling ramp inside of the pyramid's structure. The lecturer, however, asserts that that theory is also unlikely and it is very impossible to prove it. This theory has many problem concern about mobility inside of the pyramids.

Finally, the author put forth the theory that Egyptian builders created a concrete-like substance. The author contends that this fact helped to builders to form block in place at the structure. In contrast, the lecture's stance that idea is impossible. He notes that there are any microscopic evidence to prove it. Moreover, He claims that there are evidence many thousands years after of built the pyramids of Giza that concrete appeared.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ids of Giza there was not space to have a enormous structure like that. Moreover,...
^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lectures'' or 'lecture's'?
Suggestion: lectures'; lecture's
...lace at the structure. In contrast, the lectures stance that idea is impossible. He note...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06779661017 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55235554272 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1879127685 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0555555556 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191182889464 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520657448096 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071238581127 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124241913292 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419520607996 0.0443174109184 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.