Essay topics: TPO-48 - Integrated Writing TaskIn recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for th

Essay topics:

Essay topics: TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task

In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, frogs help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations.

First, frogs are being harmed by pesticides, which are chemicals used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops such as corn and sugarcane. Pesticides often spread from farmland into neighboring frog habitats. Once pesticides enter a frog’s body, they attack the nervous system, leading to severe breathing problems. If laws prohibited the farmers from using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog populations, it would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs.

A second major factor in frog population decline is a fungus that has spread around the world with deadly effect. The fungus causes thickening of the skin, and since frogs use their skin to absorb water, infected frogs die of dehydration. Recently, researchers have discovered several ways to treat or prevent infection, including antifungal medication and treatments that kill the fungus with heat. Those treatments, if applied on a large scale, would protect sensitive frog populations from infection.

Third, in a great many cases, frog populations are in decline simply because their natural habitats are threatened. Since most frog species lay their eggs in water, they are dependent on water and wetland habitats. Many such habitats are threatened by human activities, including excessive water use or the draining of wetlands to make them suitable for development. If key water habitats such as lakes and marshes were better protected from excessive water use and development, many frog species would recover.

The reading passage states that the frog species are declined and extincted in all around the world and there are three special solution for improving the situation of living of them. Otherwise, the lecturer absolutely casts doubt on this view and claims that these three solution are not affordable and effective solution for restoration of the fogs in the world.

Firstly, the speaker,in the opposite of the reading argument, says reducing of the pesticides specially in the corn and sugarcane land marvelously will not have any help for the fogs. As she says, the farmer must use this pesticides to reduce the insect and disease of the land to can produce enough crabs to can be sustainable in the market. And if this policy be ordered in some places, obviously the crab producers will be left this work because the other land owner can use this material and have a huge production and undoubtedly, they will be the winner of this policy.

Second, the lecture claims that the skins problem and solving this problem by protesting against of the infection of the fungus is not the affordable and feasible solution. Because the every fogs have a specific mach fungus infector which, it means that the policy maker must attack to each individual of this creature which it is so costly and problematic. Furthermore, these kinds are always produced and if you want to destroy them you must resist them permanently during the time for each generation of them.

Finally, the lecturer is not convinced by the reading proposal about the reducing water using by humans. This argument is that the reducing will make the water and water land more rescued and consequently it will help the fogs be survived by some special circumstances in their producing process. While, as the lecturer says, it is not the effective solution, because the statement about the causal linkage between water usages of the human and preservation of the water and water land is ridiculous, but otherwise the global warming is the main cause of this phenomena. So this policy is also not the good one.

Conclusively, it can be said that the fogs have abundant harmful problem and consequently for humans, but the policy maker must have an attention about the policies which he/she is set for preserving of this kind of creatures.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...gs in the world. Firstly, the speaker,in the opposite of the reading argument, s...
^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... fogs. As she says, the farmer must use this pesticides to reduce the insect and dis...
^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skins'' or 'skin's'?
Suggestion: skins'; skin's
... Second, the lecture claims that the skins problem and solving this problem by pro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 556, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...the global warming is the main cause of this phenomena. So this policy is also not t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, so, while, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 7.30242825607 274% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 390.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92051282051 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59157208869 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482051282051 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 419.366225166 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4333119253 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.615384615 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 21.698381199 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184880570344 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697614754279 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462547093994 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101051370707 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275490201715 0.0443174109184 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.