the fossils of bees founded in million years ago
both the author and the lecturer discuss whether bees exist on earth as early as 200 million years ago or not. The passage claims that many skeptics doubt that fossilized structures exist in the state of Arizona that resembles bee nests were created by them. The professor, on the other hand, completely rejects whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
first, both the author and the professor talk about absence of fossil of actual bees. According to the passage the earliest fossil of bee date back to 100 million years ago which is a half as old as the fossilized structure discovered in Arizona. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author's view and illustrates the idea that bee could not be preserved because of a sticky liquid called resin did not produced by trees. Therefore, no remnant of bee back to 200 million years old does not mean it did not exist.
Second of all, both the reading and lecture discuss the lack of flowering plants. The author argues that flowering plants first appeared on earth 125 million years ago, so it is unlikely bees could have existed before that time. However, the professor refutes this, saying that before appearance of flowering plant, non-flowering plants such as ferns or pine trees have existed. In other words, they precede flowering plant and bees fed on them. Later when flowering plant evolved, bees have adapted themselves to them.
Eventually, both the passage and the lecture address the subject of some detail's lack. The passage goes on to mention that fossilized structures found in Arizona lack some of the finer details of bee's nests such as spiral caps. In contrast, the professor points out that there is a chemical evidence support the idea that bees built the chambers. when fossilized chambers were chemically analyzed, it turned out that they contained some waterproof materials that is used by modern bees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | saamaan | 86 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | YasamanEsml | 86 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Liu160502 | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | reza_fattahi | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo 42glass and birds 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- if universities are given financial support to develop researches, which one do you think would receive more benefits?a) To predict weather more accuratelyb) To clean rivers and oceanc) To deal with outer space 81
- TPO 31 Sinosauropteryx 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both the author and the lecturer discuss whe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...reading through citing three reasons. first, both the author and the professor talk...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'produce'
Suggestion: produce
...of a sticky liquid called resin did not produced by trees. Therefore, no remnant of bee ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ilized structures found in Arizona lack some of the finer details of bees nests such as spi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... the idea that bees built the chambers. when fossilized chambers were chemically ana...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01577287066 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46102074615 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526813880126 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2601018489 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.375 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370799809137 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11495651041 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115708373193 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220240739304 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088605426592 0.0443174109184 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.