Integrated
Both the reading and the lecture compare the value of both communal encyclopedia and traditional one. According to the reading, the online encyclopedias due to some problems are less valuable than traditional. However, the lecturer clearly disagrees with the mentioned problems in the text and refutes each reason of author.
First, despite the reading suggest that all traditional encyclopedias have been addressed by experts more accurately. Thus, they are more valuable than online encyclopedias, the lecturer strongly believes that a full encyclopedia without any error can never be found. Also, the correction of mistakes in references can be applied by internet users easily. On the other hand, all mistakes in traditional will not be variable for decades.
Second, the reading posits that online encyclopedias are more vulnerable due to the addition of incorrect data by users. Furthermore, the hackers are able to eliminate essential information entire online encyclopedia. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this reason by elaborating two strategies to overcome hacking issues. The first strategy is using some specific formats in online encyclopedias. Second, there are several editors who are responsible to check entered information in order to efface inaccurate information by users. By this means, they will be safe from any attack by hackers.
Third, according to the reading, not only the importance of information in online encyclopedias will not be accessible but it will be so confusing for children during their projects. However, the lecturer thinks that existence of a variety of topics is the main advantage of online encyclopedias for users to find their topics and follow their interest.
in conclusion, the problems related to online encyclopedia seems to be implausible due to mentioned reasons above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-16 | ferisotoudeh | 3 | view |
- Integrated 3
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people should try several different jobs before they take a long term career. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill 87
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their topics and follow their interest. in conclusion, the problems related to o...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... topics and follow their interest. in conclusion, the problems related to onl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, thus, as for, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56939501779 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06410860455 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0283077917 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8125 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.