integrated essay TPO16
In the reading section, the writer contends that the science of archeology in the United Kingdom was faced with some problems such as losing some valuable artifacts, lacking financial support for archeological research, and having trouble finding jobs in archaeology; however, in the lecture, the professor cast doubts on the reading points by presenting some counterarguments.
Firstly, the author claims that many precious artifacts were destroyed to construction projects; in contrast, the speaker rejects this notion by stating that based on new government’s laws before each construction, desired site should be examined that it wouldn’t be archaeological interest.
Secondly, even though the writer asserts that the financial support of government for archaeological research isn’t enough, the lecturer believes that the other new governments laws is that the construction companies are responsible for paying for archaeological research for desired sites and now with this support archaeologists are capable of doing research more than the past.
Finally, according to the article, people have difficulty finding a career in archaeology; nonetheless, the professor challenges this idea too and mentions that today the government provides people with more career opportunities including examining the archaeological value of the site, planning for preserving the sit for doing research, and processing the data; as a result, nowadays we have more archaeologists compared with the past.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 60
- Agree or disagree?For success in future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 73
- Do you agree or disagree?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 70
- integrated essay TPO16 73
- TPO25-integrated essay 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the reading section, the writer conte...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s by presenting some counterarguments. Firstly, the author claims that many pre...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ldn't be archaeological interest. Secondly, even though the writer asserts...
^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and now with this support archaeologists are capable of doing research more than ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of doing research more than the past. Finally, according to the article, peopl...
^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ue of the site, planning for preserving the sit for doing research, and processing the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98165137615 5.08290768461 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32200048641 2.5805825403 129% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600917431193 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 21.2450331126 254% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5920518192 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 326.0 110.228320801 296% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.5 21.698381199 251% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 26.5 7.06452816374 375% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311960604944 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175015633571 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443359906594 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175015633571 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443359906594 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 34.0 13.3589403974 255% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 8.21 53.8541721854 15% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 5.55761589404 263% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.5 11.0289183223 231% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 18.29 12.2367328918 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.46 8.42419426049 136% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 10.7273730684 270% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.6 10.498013245 225% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 11.2008830022 259% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.