The reading and the lecture are both about Venus and the possibility of human existence here. The author of the reading feels that living in the Venus is impossible. The lecture challenges the claims made by author. He is the opinion that human existence in the Venus is possible.
To begin with, the author argues that Venus is at least 90 times greater than the Earth. Hence, all the space shuttles on the surface of Venus have been crushed. This means human would be crushed too. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. He claims that in conclusion, is doesn’t affect humans. Since, they can put the station 50 kilometers above on Venus surface. Additionally, he says that in this area the pressure as low as the Earth.
Secondly, the writer suggest in Venus there is no water. The Venus made up carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid. The lecture, however, rebuts this by mentioning that this carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric produce water. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that this chemical change can create water and oxygen.
Finally, the author posits that the cloud is thick so the sunlight can’t get through the cloud. Moreover, it is states in the article that if there is no sunlight electricity is impossible too. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is the cloud is thin so sunlight reflect on Venus. He notes that with this sunlight and the station on Venus can create enough electricity.
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing It is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with this idea 70
- A friend is trying to reduce living expenses This person is trying to decide among the following three ways to do this Find a roommate housemate who can share living expenses Buy new technology products such as the latest mobile cell phone Buy less expens 80
- Some people like to buy books to read others like to borrow books from libraries or from other people Compare the advantages of these two ways of reading Which do you prefer Why 80
- The Chevalier de Seingalt 73
- A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reading feels that living in the Venus is impossible. The lecture challenges th...
^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hat living in the Venus is impossible. The lecture challenges the claims made by a...
^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...clusion, is doesn't affect humans. Since, they can put the station 50 kilometers...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nus there is no water. The Venus made up carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric a...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...loud is thick so the sunlight can't get through the cloud. Moreover, it is s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, at least, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59869835293 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522267206478 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9416044998 49.2860985944 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.3157894737 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116117667906 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421613335485 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579397034201 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739789243632 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045107850327 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.3589403974 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.54 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.