The reading passage discusses about nutrias which are rat like animals growing in damp and semi-aquatic areas. The passage is mainly concerned about controlling measures of nutrias. Several methods are suggested in the passage. However, the lectures tries to reprimand those control measures are they are deemed inappropriate.
The very first control strategy is use of modern fences and walls made of hard materials. Wooden fences cannot be selected because nutrias are very efficient in cutting with their teeth. On the contrary, the lecturer posits this is not a good idea. As nutrias are efficient diggers, using fences would not be good solution. Nutria passes the barred fences by digging through tunnel under the fences. Hence, the idea is not factual.
The reading passage also states drying up of drainage as next method for controlling. According to the passage, nutrias dwell around drainage and use these drainage channel to move. But, the lecturer counters the solution by stating, draining of water from irrigation channels might cause negative effect to plant growth. Draining of channels during peak water requiring stages might hamper growth of vegetables and crops. Although, controlling of nutria might be effective, it adversely affects crop which is not a better trade.
Finally, the passage suggest decreasing the population of nutrias by consuming them as food can be effective. Nutrias are good source of protein and have very less amount of fats and cholesterol. Its meat contains higher protein in comparison to beef. In contrasts, the lecturer states nutria are not good for consuming. It is host for many bacteria and parasites. Consuming its meat may result in Tuberculosis and septicemia. The parasites inside it might cause rash, fever and eventually drastic health loss. Therefore, consuming these might turn out to be quite expensive.
Thus, the reading passage is trying to provide solutions to control nutria. However, the lecturer provides insight in negative sites of these control measures. The lecturer states all the solutions in reading passage are inappropriate.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today put too much emphasis on personal appearance and fashion 73
- It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for people to choose jobs that come with high salaries even though they do not enjoy doing it than to choose jobs that they enjoy but come with low salaries Use specific reasons and exampl 81
- Reading Passage Although Johannes Vermeer is famous for his masterpiece quot Girl with a Pearl Earring quot not much is known about who modeled for the painting The curiosity aroused by the mystery brought about several theories about the true i 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should spend money on things that last a long time such as expensive pieces of jewelry than spend money on short term pleasureslike vacations 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this drainage' or 'these drainages'?
Suggestion: this drainage; these drainages
..., nutrias dwell around drainage and use these drainage channel to move. But, the lecturer coun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39090909091 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65069078094 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 13.0662251656 199% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3732576163 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.4230769231 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6923076923 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0700460657974 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0192111248174 0.0996497079465 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033546498017 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408307394132 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255493934727 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.09 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this drainage' or 'these drainages'?
Suggestion: this drainage; these drainages
..., nutrias dwell around drainage and use these drainage channel to move. But, the lecturer coun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39090909091 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65069078094 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 13.0662251656 199% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3732576163 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.4230769231 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6923076923 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0700460657974 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0192111248174 0.0996497079465 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033546498017 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408307394132 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255493934727 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.09 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.