Recently, there has been a ton of debate about solving the significant problems caused by nutria. More specifically, in regard to the passages, the writer puts forth ideas with three proposals that could solve the problem. In the listening passage, in contrast, the lecturer is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in each claim. In fact, the professor believes there should be another option and addresses each difficulty raised in the reading text in detail.
To begin with, the author brings up the idea of building fences with sheet metal and metal wire to prevent nutria from further constructing habitats. Likewise, the lecturer agrees that nutria cannot chew through metal fences but can dig under them. Thus, according to the points of the lecture, the construction of metal fences would be useless.
On top of that, one group of farmers, represented by the writer, thinks that removing the excess water from drainage would slow the processes of reproduction and habitat. Of course, though, not all experts in this field believe this is accurate. Again, the speaker specifically contends that rain would repeatedly fill the drainage, causing farmers to drain it. He further argues that low-lying regions would be at risk of doing so since they have limited access to water.
Last but not least, the author wraps up his argument by positing that trapping a number and eradicating it is another key. Unsurprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim, contending that the procedure would be ineffective since pregnant nutria can give birth to thirty infants and the chances of capturing and spotting them are low.
To sum up, although both the passages talk about the same topic, they both hold conflicting views. For this reason, it would be evidently for them to be on the same page, so there should be further debate to find common ground on this issue.
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time Compare the benefits of planning free time activities with the benefits of not making plans Which do you prefer plannin 84
- The nutria is a large rodent similar to a beaver that typically weighs about 10 kilograms These rodents usually live in semi aquatic habitats and though they originate from South America they are now common in freshwater areas throughout North America Nut 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage about deforestation 3
- Although dinosaurs are considered as the strongest creatures that have ever lived on Earth they were not strong enough to defy extinction Since there are no definite data that could identify the cause of extinction many theories have been suggested These 80
- Your local government has just recently received a large donation from an anonymous donor to improve the community Almost everyone agrees that the money should be invested in building a new public facility Which of the following do you think your local go 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, so, thus, in contrast, in fact, of course, in regard to, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02222222222 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51392493804 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615873015873 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4224732793 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0646181890294 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211915933845 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214046484718 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0339768534305 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152741347697 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.