The reading and the lecture are both about the Plain of jars, which had founded in Laos country with many different dimensions stones sizes from one to three meters. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer puts forth the idea that there are three possible theories for the purpose of using these containers. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the reading claims. In fact, the professor believes that the goal from using these stones are mysterious and uncertain, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point made in the reading text.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states these jars have been used for the fermentation of food and drinks to keep them from any reactions with chemical changes. The article mentions that the jars for the first time were constructed to keep drinks for festivals, so the story may be true. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that this story is not true, because people at that time were using clay to keep any drink. Additionally, he points out that making stones take more effort and time, so why they would do it if they have the ability to make clay easily?
Secondly, the author suggests that jars were used for storing water because jaws has some dry seasons. In the article, it is said that these jars were located nearby trade routes where travelers can use them for drinking fresh water. Again, the speaker specifically asserts this idea by suggesting that these routes were located nearby rivers and streams. He goes on to say that no need for another source of fresh water for the travelers.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that jar was used as tombs where people can stay after death and its large to keep anybody inside them. moreover, much jewelry and high-value metals were found inside these jars, so they believe these are from people after burying them inside the jars. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that these jars were not used as tombs because tombs need to be covered to keep the remains of the bodies from animals or air. He notes that these jars have not any cover on them or nearby them.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Having children is less important than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 66
- TPO 21 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 26 The zebra mussel a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it pos 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... which had founded in Laos country with many different dimensions stones sizes from one to thr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... its large to keep anybody inside them. moreover, much jewelry and high-value metals wer...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, in fact, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 393.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71501272265 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24264133085 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503816793893 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8419182181 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143269239681 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491473150854 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402988816846 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893709056669 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320929516483 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.