In this set of materials, the reading passage says that smart cars will improve our lives in and we will be only a passenger. There are three reasons to support this. On the other hand, the lecturer says that there are no clear benefits and refutes each reading reasons on the passage.
First of all the writer claims that this car will reduce the numbers of accidents. The lecture says that is not clear like this. She told that this smarts car, like all technology, can fail and cause, in fact, more accidents. In addition, because they will be together as a pack, they will be easily involved in more problems.
Second, the reading passage says that the increase in smart cars will cease the problems with traffic. On the other hand, the lecturer says that as the history says to us, drivers are inconvenient and can not let this car going fast. Moreover, The traffic and rush hours not allow drivers to take advantage of this
Thirdly the text shows that smart cars will reduce our cost of driving. The lecture disagrees with this saying that because of the sensors are expensive this car will be very expensive to repair and to maintain. In addition, they will need to replace traditional mechanics.
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 66
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them 60
- smart cars 63
- TOEFL integrated writing: communal online encyclopedia 80
- some people prefer to live with a roommate. others prefer to live alone. compare the advantages of each choice. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, so, third, thirdly, in addition, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70892018779 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26307637756 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49765258216 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.214718356 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5833333333 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268479579951 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115420164229 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115194403676 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197661621373 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297979412537 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.