The reading and the lecture are both concerned with deforestation, the clearing of a large area of nature. According to the author, deforestation has numerous advantages, but the professor disputes each of his points.
First, the reading passage states that deforestation provides an abundance of farmland, allowing farmers to have better opportunities to breed livestock and plant crops. As a result, it provides enough food for every citizen; nevertheless, the listening passage contends that 60% of the rainforest in Brazil is being destroyed for agricultural purposes. Moreover, it argues that people are not looking for alternatives to traditional farming, such as hydroponics, which has more benefits.
Second, the writer claims deforestation allows society to have enough residential areas for the continuously increasing population and people to have jobs, such as investment and construction. On the other hand, the professor firmly thinks that people are looking at short-term benefits rather than long-term consequences since deforestation signifies plants and animals that inhabit the region that will become extinct or in danger due to habitat loss. On top of that, the lecturer points out that plants produce most of the oxygen humans need for survival.
Third, the text explains that it is an integral part of national economies and nations, for instance, Brazil, Thailand, and Indonesia, which rely on deforestation as a source of income. The writer notes that individuals work hard to satisfy the demand for paper, furniture, and other resources. In contrast, the audio describes how individuals do not earn much and are risking their lives to carry out dangerous jobs, which gives greater good to the authorities.
To sum up, although both sources discuss the same topic, deforestation, it is evident that they conclude with different views and details. With this in mind, it will be difficult for both to find common ground on the matter, and the flaws pointed out by the professor effectively challenge the author that they thought too narrow-mindedly about the issue.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 3
- The nutria is a large rodent similar to a beaver that typically weighs about 10 kilograms These rodents usually live in semi aquatic habitats and though they originate from South America they are now common in freshwater areas throughout North America Nut 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 90
- Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B C This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood fr 81
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time Compare the benefits of planning free time activities with the benefits of not making plans Which do you prefer plannin 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nhabitants rather than a park and pool.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, likewise, really, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i feel, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 379.0 270.72406181 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06332453826 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75366444964 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 145.348785872 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591029023747 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 419.366225166 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4118224384 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0337790334608 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0122389203313 0.0996497079465 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028083589467 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0209514820539 0.162205337803 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155360836293 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.