The reading article and lecture both talked about Jane Austen, the famous English novelist. The article state that there is a portrait of teenage Jane is owned by her family and there are good reasons to believe this. However, the professor explaining that is not convincing and questionable. He also refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading state that the portrait is recognized by her family and has endorsed the claim that the girl in the painting is Jane Austen. Nevertheless, the professor rebuts this point by stating that the portrait is recognized almost 70 years after her death and the family member may not see her. So, this can be not her paint.
Second, the article avers that the face of the portrait is similar to the one in Cassandra's sketch. It says that the features are very much like in the full-length portrait with the sketch. Nonetheless, the lecture contends that the face of sketch can be resembled with any similar relative's face. Because Jane has many cousins who may resemble her. Their faces can look like hers. Professor gives an example of Mary to emphasize his claim.
Third, the reading posits that the style of the portrait is linked to Ozias Humphrey who was the kind of professional the wealthy Austen family would hire. The lecture opposes this point by saying that the style may like the Ozias Humphrey, but they used canvas painting after the Jane young age. They used blank canvas on painting which they used to use the period when Jane was not a teenager.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 60
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 71
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 60
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.First, atmospheric 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s each of the authors reasons. First, the reading state that the portrait is r...
^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...embled with any similar relatives face. Because Jane has many cousins who may resemble ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78707224335 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34027252236 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520912547529 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7372267137 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6875 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.