TOEFL T P O 20 - Integrated Writing Task
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about whether the “let it burn” policy should be replaced by other policy or not. In the text, the author claims that there are some viable damages caused by the "let it burn policy". The lecturer challenges all the causes mentioned in the reading. She is of the opinion that none of these damages is destructive.
Firstly, the author states that Yellowstone fires lead to tremendous damage to park's trees and vegetation. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that Yellowstone fires not only was not destructive but also was creative. She argues that after the fires surpassed some new plant and crops such as new seeds were cultivated in those areas. Thus, this fire was essential for new vegetation appearance.
In addition, the reading passages proposes that Yellowstone fires were damaged to wildlife habitat and some small animals affected by these fires. The lecturer, on the other hand, asserts that these fires were very helpful for some animals such as rabbits. Furthermore, she says that these animals were able to find an ideal habitat for their thrive.
Eventually, the author holds the view that Yellowstone fires discouraged tourists to come to these areas and it has adverse impact on local economy. The speaker, however, rebuts this by asserting that there are other important factors such as lack of rainfall have been affecting on the number of yearly tourists. She believes that numerous tourists came to these areas for visiting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one of these damages is destructive. Firstly, the author states that Yellowst...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'park'.
Suggestion: park
...tone fires lead to tremendous damage to parks trees and vegetation. Conversely, the l...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssential for new vegetation appearance. In addition, the reading passages p...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d an ideal habitat for their thrive. Eventually, the author holds the view th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, as for, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11553784861 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57620787868 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569721115538 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1321565238 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7142857143 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.