TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri

The reading and the lecture are both about employment, which is related to four days work. The author of the reading believes that the shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that offering will probably stand for various profit, such as medical benefit.

First of all, the author points out that for the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. It is mentioned that If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says by hiring a lot of employeement, company have to offer amount of state and computer for their work.

Finally, the author contends that the option of a four-day workweek would be better for the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure individual employees. The lecture rebuts this argument. He suggests and says whether they getting their freetime less or more, life quality of them will be presented the risk.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...make fewer costly errors in their work. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, thus, such as, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90946502058 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40084575861 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8187197059 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4166666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.701379921991 0.272083759551 258% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20492068647 0.0996497079465 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170830527081 0.0662205650399 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.444142647825 0.162205337803 274% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126886344237 0.0443174109184 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.