The article states that offering emplyees 4-day workweek with less pay could be beneficial for both economics and individual companies. Conversely, the profssor states that if companies would do so, it would not add any significane benefit for either employees or companies. And he refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that the shortened workweek would increase company profits, because employees would get enough rested time and become alert, so they ould do less errors. The professor, on the other hand, refutes this point by stating that companies would spend much more money than before. Companies whose hired emplyees for 4 day workweek, they will need to add new workers. This means more training, and more health benf The professor explains that health benefits would be differenece hether an employee worked or 5 days per a week. In addition those new workers would need more space and more desks. As a result, All of these reasons would lead companies to spend more money that would be cutting from its profits. companies would get more money from offering 4 wrokweek to their employees.
Second, the article avers that one of the primary bebnfots of offering this option to empolyees is that it would reduce unemployement rates. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that this option would not make jobs available. As he mentioned earlier, the cost of hiring of new employees is very expensive, so companies would have other option to do. For instance, a company force their wmployees to work overtime, or a company would increase their expectation level And consequently, an employee who worked 4-day workweek would have to do the same amount of work as worked for 5-days, and company did no to creat more jobs. the professor concludes by offering 4-day would create jobs unpleasant environment for emplyees.
Third, the reading posits that employees who worked 4-day would have time to spend with their families and beloved ones, so they would improve their quality of lives. professor disagrees with this point by saying that working 4 days a week would present risks and reduce the quality of lives for people. He adds that working 4 ays would create jobs instability and hurt advancing in jobs. According to the professor, an emplyee that worked 4 days per week would be first to lose his job or lose the opportunity to get promoted. Because companies would prefer to promote an employee who worked days per week in management position. For the reason of constant supervisom
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 85
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 83
- TPO-27 - Integrated Writing Task The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scient 78
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... time and become alert, so they ould do less errors. The professor, on the other han...
^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workweek' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workweeks'.
Suggestion: workweeks
...ompanies whose hired emplyees for 4 day workweek, they will need to add new workers. Thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...mployee worked or 5 days per a week. In addition those new workers would need more space...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Companies
...that would be cutting from its profits. companies would get more money from offering 4 wr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...k as worked for 5-days, and company did no to creat more jobs. the professor concl...
^^
Line 5, column 640, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... and company did no to creat more jobs. the professor concludes by offering 4-day w...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unpleasant environment for emplyees. Third, the reading posits that employees...
^^^
Line 8, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Professor
...y would improve their quality of lives. professor disagrees with this point by saying tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 529, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r lose the opportunity to get promoted. Because companies would prefer to promote an em...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 5.04856512141 515% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1373.03311258 155% => OK
No of words: 421.0 270.72406181 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04038004751 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51408319369 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 145.348785872 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477434679335 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5254027844 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.047619048 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0476190476 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.612023943956 0.272083759551 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204431091366 0.0996497079465 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103893820097 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.426670544234 0.162205337803 263% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711634858211 0.0443174109184 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.