In this reading, it is assumed that having a group of team will conduct the projects more efficiently and benefit to everyone in this team. They can also come up with more risky ideas than individuals do. However, the professor claims that according to the survey on the situation of carrying on the projects, becoming a team have no advantages at all.
First of all, the reading claims that the decision of having a group and the consequence of collaboration will be beneficial to every individual. It is reputed in the reading by the professor. There are some people who never contributed to the team in the six months acquiring nothing from the projects. They do not harvest anything , and cannot feel the pleasure or accomplishment as well.
In addition, the reading contend that people will realize they are as a whole and recognize the strength of team spirits. However, the professor points out that it has no means about whether you have a team spirit or not. The idea to cheer them up is totally unsuccessful according to their attitude toward to the whole plan.
Furthermore, the lecture opposes the the argument that the projects will be carrying out more efficient in the reading, for it is hard to reach a consensus in time. It takes long to discuss and make the decision. If there is someone who is more influential claiming that an idea cannot work, then this idea will not be under further discussion. If there is someone who is more powerful agreeing a plan, even there is someone doubting the possibility of conducting the plan, his idea will be neglected. So the while process is more suitable and efficient at all.
At last, if the plan failed, everyone is to blame even they did not vote on the plan or even participate the plan.
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 60
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 3
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 73
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e projects. They do not harvest anything , and cannot feel the pleasure or accompl...
^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...an. Furthermore, the lecture opposes the the argument that the projects will be carr...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...an. Furthermore, the lecture opposes the the argument that the projects will be carr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72077922078 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66096572249 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50974025974 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5170273842 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.875 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335464475055 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10113002538 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729048925302 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169815001643 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101222292616 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.