The reading and the lecture are both about the project by a group of people. Whereas the author of the reading states that working in a group is advantageous, the lecture suggest that working individual is more beneficial than working in a group. The lecture casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing two/three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, in a group of people working will wider knowledge, expertise and skill than working individual. However, the lecture disputes this point. He says that working in a group, some member has a free ride. Further more , he/she mention that some people will get benefited by not doing anything. And, the real contributor are not getting theirs proper value of their hard work
Secondly ,the reading states that the working in a group is very creative as people will come up with high creativity. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this argument. He argues that working in a group is very influential, people do not consider other's opinion or idea. In addition, he points out the project will not go quickly, it needs more time that required.
Finally, the reading claims that group of people will take a risky decision and are responsible for those decision. On the other hand, the lecture believe that instead of discussion with other, with the agreement of few people the project decision are taken. He thinks that the blame of moving in a wrong direction of the project are consider all as few people was only responsible. Moreover, he feels that working individual is more healthy and good as it is guided by only one decision and is responsibility of individual.
In conclusion, although the reading and lecture are both about the working of the people in a group, the two/three main point made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecture.
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ome member has a free ride. Further more , he/she mention that some people will ge...
^^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
... has a free ride. Further more , he/she mention that some people will get benefited by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...roper value of their hard work Secondly ,the reading states that the working in a...
^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...in a wrong direction of the project are consider all as few people was only responsible....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89423076923 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64069829183 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474358974359 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7929699162 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4375 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299187195267 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109664873044 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665980507258 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179899586359 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456688346411 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.