TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

The article and the lecture both discuss advantage and disadvantages of assembling a group of people to work on a project as a team. The article states that group process provides several advantages, and probably is the best way an organization uses to approach new projects. The author provides three reasons for support. However, the professor disagrees with the reading and refutes each of the author's reason.

First, the reading states that gathering people to work as a team provides more diversity of people who have expertise, skills, and knowledge compare with working individually. The professor refutes this point by stating that after observed a group process in one company, the result shows that not everybody participates in a group working. Moreover, if a team did a great job, some members who did not contribute much would benefit from the recognition as well as the others who work hard.

Second, the article claims that working as a team has more people and resources involves in projects. Therefore, new projects can be done faster than working individually. Moreover, a group process provides more creative solutions to problems because people share the responsibility for making a decision and tend to make a risky decision that individual might not attempt to dose. However, the professor contends that working as a team can take a longer time to finish projects because it takes time for meetings before they can find the final consensus and make a group decision.

Third, the reading claims that members of the team get benefit from a group process. The author explains that Influential members will be willing to follow the work created by other members. Also, an individual member has much chance to contribute to the group and will be well recognized. This is because a team's overall results can have a great impact than working alone. The professor disagrees with this point. He says that not everyone's voice are heard in a group process. There were some influential people in a group tend to convince the team to make decisions basted on their ideas and everyone most likely follow these people ideas and ignore others who disagree with. However, when the project failed, the negative reputation was placed on every member of a group, not individual ones.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nization uses to approach new projects. The author provides three reasons for suppo...
^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a team' or simply 'teams'?
Suggestion: a team; teams
...ill be well recognized. This is because a teams overall results can have a great impact...
^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'as well as']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260240963855 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.173493975904 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0626506024096 0.0723426182421 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0578313253012 0.0435111971325 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00963855421687 0.0277247811725 35% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113253012048 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0385542168675 0.0370669169778 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63765421072 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0289156626506 0.0208969081088 138% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.142168674699 0.128158765124 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0192771084337 0.0158828679856 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0120481927711 0.0114777025283 105% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2291.0 1645.83664459 139% => OK
No of words: 379.0 271.125827815 140% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04485488127 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.04852973271 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393139841689 0.374372842146 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.298153034301 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187335092348 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108179419525 0.113142543107 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63765421072 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485488126649 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.7001016078 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0529801325 146% => OK
Sentence length: 19.9473684211 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0296747083 49.3711431718 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.578947368 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.878197800319 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 49.7626718511 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.71 1.90840788429 90% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.706325138373 0.549887131256 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0958600942067 0.142949733639 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0674924790704 0.0787303798458 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.492587588232 0.631733273073 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149078043622 0.139662658121 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.260873959825 0.266732575781 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109385244611 0.103435571967 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.373120935199 0.414875509568 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0279627955584 0.0530846634433 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.508509461135 0.40443939384 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769803147908 0.0528353158467 146% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 10.2958057395 185% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

who have expertise, skills, and knowledge compare with working individually.
who have expertise, skills, and knowledge compared with working individually.

flaws:
No. of Words: 379 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 12
No. of Words: 379 250
No. of Characters: 1871 1200
No. of Different Words: 178 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.412 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.937 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.564 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.947 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.63 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.333 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.491 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4