Both the article and the lecture discusses about a painting named "The portrait of an elderly Woman" by Rembrandt, who was a famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters. The article doubts about the painting that it may not be painted by Ramberndt whereas the lecture describes detail incidents happened after the original painting was made and how it disguised the original style of the the artist and finally proves this painting to be actually done by Rambrandth himself.
First, the article state the concentration of Rambrandt on fine details which was missing the painting. Hence the lady in the painting was wearing a white linen cap mostly used by servants along with luxurious fur coat which obviously cannot be afforded by any servant. On the contrary the lecturer reveals that the fur collar was painted around 100 years after the original painting to present aristocracy in the lady and increase the value of the painting. But originally the Rambrandt used a very simple fur collar which is actually matching withe lenin cap. With this the lecturer argues the painting is actually made by Rambrandt.
Secondly, the author says about the anomaly of lighting in the painting as the face of the lady was enlightened by a light from the below. Whereas the dark color should absorb light and face should be more darker. As Rambrandt is well know for his mastry in light and shadow, this painting was doubted for a actual painting by him. However the lecture says after careful examination and pigment analysis it was found that the dark color was added afterwards and the original painting actually contians a light coloured fur collar, so the face lighting was actual in the original painting.
Fianlly, this particular piece of painting was made on wood panel, which was made of multiple pieces of wood, as the author claims, which also is not a regular style of Rambrandt. But the lecture states more details as these new wood pieces were added when the fur collar was repainted to make the painting grand and increase its value. Moreover the original piece of wood used in the painting is from tree from where another piece of wood has been used for Rambrandt's another painting of his self portrait.
To conclude, though the article states multiple doubtful aspects of the painting whereas, the lectures describes the incidents behind the scene, how the actual painting has been altered and refutes all the arguments made in the article and proved the painting was actually painted by Rambrandt.
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to develop your essay.(REWRITE) 70
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to develop your essay.(REWRITE) 60
- 72) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades (marks) encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- You have received a gift of money. The money is enough to buy either a piece of jewelry you like or tickets to a concert you want to attend. Which would you buy? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 60
- Some people think attending live performance (of concerts, plays, football games etc.) is better than watching those events on television. Do you agree or disagree with the view? Use specific examples and reasons to explain your answer. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... how it disguised the original style of the the artist and finally proves this painting...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... how it disguised the original style of the the artist and finally proves this painting...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...details which was missing the painting. Hence the lady in the painting was wearing a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'darker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: darker
... should absorb light and face should be more darker. As Rambrandt is well know for his mast...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...ld be more darker. As Rambrandt is well know for his mastry in light and shadow, thi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d shadow, this painting was doubted for a actual painting by him. However the lec...
^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s doubted for a actual painting by him. However the lecture says after careful examinat...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... painting grand and increase its value. Moreover the original piece of wood used in the ...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266958424508 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.17067833698 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0722100656455 0.0723426182421 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0415754923414 0.0435111971325 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0175054704595 0.0277247811725 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135667396061 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0612691466083 0.0370669169778 165% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4701788172 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00875273522976 0.0208969081088 42% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.155361050328 0.128158765124 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00875273522976 0.0158828679856 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0218818380744 0.0114777025283 191% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2529.0 1645.83664459 154% => OK
No of words: 423.0 271.125827815 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97872340426 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.04852973271 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382978723404 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.302600472813 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212765957447 0.187439937562 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0874704491726 0.113142543107 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4701788172 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439716312057 0.539623497131 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.4696969051 53.8517498576 88% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 28.2 21.7502111507 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7489466269 49.3711431718 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.6 132.220823453 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 21.7502111507 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.39072847682 236% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 58.4600472813 50.5018328374 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.01904761905 1.90840788429 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.6777351482 0.549887131256 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146778661057 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0496009529362 0.0787303798458 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.681161568702 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167353445778 0.139662658121 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.349475505407 0.266732575781 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103088708758 0.103435571967 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.505315101109 0.414875509568 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0966153622044 0.0530846634433 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.509043727657 0.40443939384 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394438903096 0.0528353158467 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.