The reading passage describes one of the Rembrandt’s paintings and the author expressed doubts on the authenticity as it does not resemble and depict Rembrandt’s style. However, the professor in the lecture clarified those doubts by saying suitable points.
Firstly, the passage casts doubts on the painting by pointing out the dressing style of the woman. As per passage, the woman’s coat has a luxurious fur collar which cannot be afforded by any servant thus questioned the inconsistency. To this, the professor explained that the fur was not part of the original paintings and it is confirmed by the X-ray reports. She said someone might have added the fur to increase the value of the painting.
Secondly, the reading passage states that the lighting in the painting is not proper as it shows the face of the lady is illuminated and the fur appeared dark which is not a typical Rembrandt’s style. However, the professor explains that the lighting part represents Rembrandt’s style. She says that if the fur is removed then the light collar will appear illuminated and there is proper light and shadow in the painting as expected in Rembrandt’s paintings.
Thirdly, the passage doubts this painting because it is made of several wood pieces glued together, whereas all Rembrandt’s paintings are done on single piece of wood. The professor says that there is no need to doubt on this because they are glued to make it more grand and valuable. She also says that the original painting was done on a single piece of wood as expected in any other Rembrandt’s style.
Thus the professor clarified the doubts in reading passage and asserts that the painting is indeed a creation of Rembrandt’s.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...d in any other Rembrandt's style. Thus the professor clarified the doubts in r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16140350877 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12318941085 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459649122807 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.44184111 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.153846154 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406131196716 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164110551664 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927513196001 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243922362927 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612758309962 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.