Both the reading passage and the lecture are about determining the actual use Chaco houses. The writer states three theory for actual use of these houses. However, the lecturer casts doubt onto the claims made but the writer, saying that his arguments have some problems when compered to real facts.
First, the writer claims that architecture style of Chaco indicates that a lot of resident have been living for years. However, professor states, this claim is not convincing. Inside of the these massive stone buildings refutes this claim. Inside of these houses, there are no fire room. Which is require for cooking.
Second, the author states that purpose of these house actually place for storing food. The professor refutes this point. He states, this claim is not true by evidence. Moreover, professor states if these houses were actually food store, why there are more maize on flood.
Third, the passage claims that people were used Chaco structures as special ceremonies center. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt onto this claim by stating this theory is not well supported. Furthermore, he states archaeologists also found large number of material. This finding suggest these materials were just trash so the pots are also only regular trash.
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 60
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...ouses, there are no fire room. Which is require for cooking. Second, the author stat...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... large number of material. This finding suggest these materials were just trash so the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17961165049 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29389863944 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0950533646 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.6875 110.228320801 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.875 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242428427171 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844660091817 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576272269648 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149809018907 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245222148191 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.