The reading provides three theories which determine how the buildings of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico were used. On the other hand, the professor refutes each author's theories and says that there aren't many evidences for supporting those theories.
Initially, the reading mentions first theory by saying that Chaco's structures were purely residential and hundreds of people used to live there. On the contrary, the professor states that even though outside of the Chaco's buildings may be similar to the large, well-known "apartment buildings" at Taos, inside of the Chaco's buildings demonstrates that such many people couldn't have been living there. He says that there aren't many rooms and fire places in Chaco's buildings that were required for many inhabitant people.
Furthermore, the reading introduces second theory. This theory claims that Chaco's buildings used to store food supplies; for instance, grain maize; which was one of the main crops of Chaco people and could be stored for long periods, was stored there and that was because of size of the Chaco's houses. In contrast, the professor claims that there aren't enough evidences to proof this theory. He says that if these houses had stored grain maize, they would have had big remained containers or remained maize crops on the floor.
Finally, the reading provides third theory, which claims that Chaco's houses were used as ceremonial centers and it is because of the finding of large number of broken pots. Theory is of the conviction that people used to gather around for special ceremonies and eat meals in these pots. However, the professor refutes this theory and says there have been found lots of other materials beside pots; such as, construction building materials include sand and stones. He claims that pots could be used by building constructors and were lefted behind.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One should never judge a person by external appearances Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 45
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 80
- what? 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 57
Essay evaluation report
the reading mentions first theory
the reading mentions the first theory
the reading introduces second theory.
the reading introduces the second theory.
to proof this theory.
to prove this theory.
the reading provides third theory,
the reading provides the third theory,
there have been found lots of other materials beside pots
there have found lots of other materials beside pots
lots of other materials beside pots have been found
Sentence: He claims that pots could be used by building constructors and were lefted behind.
Error: lefted Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 304 250
No. of Characters: 1516 1200
No. of Different Words: 146 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.176 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.987 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.352 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.385 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.126 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.396 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.591 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ch authors theories and says that there arent many evidences for supporting those the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ings demonstrates that such many people couldnt have been living there. He says that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...e been living there. He says that there arent many rooms and fire places in Chacos bu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ntrast, the professor claims that there arent enough evidences to proof this theory. ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276785714286 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.175595238095 0.158904122519 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.077380952381 0.0723426182421 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0357142857143 0.0435111971325 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.014880952381 0.0277247811725 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139880952381 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0565476190476 0.0370669169778 153% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.47633241351 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.014880952381 0.0208969081088 71% => OK
Particles: 0.00297619047619 0.00154638098197 192% => OK
Determiners: 0.0803571428571 0.128158765124 63% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0119047619048 0.0158828679856 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0178571428571 0.0114777025283 156% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1861.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 300.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20333333333 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.374372842146 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243333333333 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166666666667 0.187439937562 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12 0.113142543107 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47633241351 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513333333333 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 51.5871063441 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0769230769 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5206691761 49.3711431718 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.153846154 132.220823453 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.15384615385 0.878197800319 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 47.4102564103 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.09210526316 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.694078972708 0.549887131256 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110824924495 0.142949733639 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0702345322532 0.0787303798458 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.585085974162 0.631733273073 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146632782412 0.139662658121 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.305028357941 0.266732575781 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13575218067 0.103435571967 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.399495643859 0.414875509568 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0224735619778 0.0530846634433 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.50475445459 0.40443939384 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361675249871 0.0528353158467 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 3.1766004415 283% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.