The article states that US wiid companies will not interested in getting ecocerification for their product and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that there good reasons that encouage US wood companies to seek ecocertification and he refutes each od the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that US consumers would not value or pay particular attention to the ecocertificatio label because they are exposed to so many advertisment. The professor refutes this point by explaining that consumers do not treat all advertisments the same way. US consumers can easily distinguish between advertisment that made by a company for its product and advertisments that made by independent agency. Since the ecocertified wood would be adveristed by independent agency, it would gain consumers confident easily. He concludes that consumers usually in favor of buting wood products that ecocertified.
Second, the article posits that ecocertified wood will be more expensive than uncertified wood because of the additional cost of getting certification. The professor, on the hand, states that economics studies have shown that consumers would only depend on price if the margin of price among products are highly expensive. But, if the difference between product is less than 5 % , as in the case of ecocertified wood difference, consumers are likely to choose products depending on other factors. So, consumers adopt new ideas of preserving and protect environment, ecocertified wood would be their first choice to purchase.
Third, the reading avers that pursing certification would be sense for AMerican companies if they marketed their product overseas. The professor opposes this point by saying that of course US companies should be carefull attention because of the foreign competetion inside the Unites States markerts. Since US companies negelect the influence of ecocertifed wood on their markets, foreiners companies will invade the markerts and compete them on selling certified wood which make US comapnies lose a lot of profits.
- Over the last few decades, there has been a warming trend across the globe. Many view this perceived pattern of increasing temperatures as unnatural and a result of the surge in carbon emissions produced by industrialized nations. Though some may debate t 86
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 81
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People behave differently when they wear different clothes Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave Use specific examples to support your answer 82
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
... states that US wiid companies will not interested in getting ecocerification for their pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ference between product is less than 5 % , as in the case of ecocertified wood dif...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56329113924 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06710673188 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3954370791 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.571428571 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509348965063 0.272083759551 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175388300781 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575617056616 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301075661983 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568415746336 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.