The both the reading passage and the lecture are about eco certificaiton. The writer states that, there some wood companies around the world nicely have adopted the new practices to get this certificate, on the other hand, wood business companies from the USA will not do the same and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor states that there are good reasons to eventually USA wood companies eventually need eco certification for their product. and refutes each of the authors reasons.
First, the author states that American people are not trust to the commercials, so eco certification will not bring any value to the company. The professor refutes this point. He states American people not treat same to all advertisement. American consumers have great confidence to independent consumer agencies. If the advertisement come from these agencies, their trust will increase.
Second, the reading passage claims wood with eco certificate will be more costly than uncertifacated wood. On the other hand, the professor states of course consumer will pay attention to price of a wood. Nevertheless, some studies show that, consumer pay attention to price difference. Thanks to the low price difference between certificated woods and uncertifecated woods, the consumer tend to choose certificated woods.
Third, the argument which American companies will implement the developments in around the world not convincing. The professor casts doubt onto this claim by stating American wood companies pay attention to the competition. If American wood companies will not get certificate, wood companies from USA will loose customers to the abroad companies.
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 60
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 76
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 81
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...om USA pay attention to some commercial.If the advertisiment come from the indepen...
^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...rtificate, wood companies from USA will loose customers to the abroad companies.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55691056911 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08779642258 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50406504065 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3202760079 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482902307388 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177669662615 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105617170871 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296875908433 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102962012003 0.0443174109184 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.