TPO 11
The article states that the value of literature about novels and plays are dwindling in society and provides three reasons for support for it. However, the lecturer explains that literature is not limited to the materials in novels and refutes the author's points.
First, the reading explains that no such thing encourages readers' minds as much as novels do. With the decline in the comprehension of this kind of text, the public is missing out on some beautiful views of literature. However, the professor states that literature is not exactly what the author claims it to be. Literature can dwell in history books and science books, and all these books could be as high-quality written like a decent novel. A reader's mind can be stimulated with a good science book as well as a play.
Second, the author claims that society, in general, is moving away from books, including novels and literature. The professor, however, contends that the public's depriving of one form of art does not necessarily mean missing out all the sources on the expression of emotions and ideas. Sources like a piece of good music or a high-quality movie still are valuable to many people. She says that this form of expression is more appealing to a modern audience.
Third and last, the reading avers that this ignorance toward literature had resulted in disregard toward the artists and authors as well. However, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that the blame in on the authors in this matter, rather than the readers. She feels this way because the authors these days are developing very hard-to-read content. The type of literature regarding meaning and structure is different from the past, and the readers from the then would also avoid reading books this complicated as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | meet96300 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-09 | Alana Gerber | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | khatuntajkera | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Pooja dave | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more appealing to a modern audience. Third and last, the reading avers that t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, then, third, well, in general, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9966442953 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57547657551 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53355704698 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2822282091 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317800494089 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097508915769 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410627044494 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178017906145 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582131536046 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.