TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task
A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and for the future of literature itself. While there has been a decline in book reading generally, the decline has been especially sharp for literature. This is unfortunate because nothing else provides the intellectual stimulation that literature does. Literature encourages us to exercise our imaginations, empathize with others, and expand our understanding of language. So by reading less literature, the reading public is missing out on important benefits.
Unfortunately, missing out on the benefits of literature is not the only problem. What are people reading instead? Consider the prevalence of self-help books on lists of best sellers. These are usually superficial poorly written, and intellectually undemanding. Additionally, instead of sitting down with a challenging novel, many persons are now more likely to turn on the television, watch a music video, or read a Web page. Clearly, diverting time previously spent in reading literature to trivial forms of entertainment has lowered the level of culture in general.
The trend of reading less literature is all the more regrettable because it is taking place during a period when good literature is being written. There are many talented writers today, but theylack an audience. This fact is bound to lead publishers to invest less in literature and so support fewer serious writers. Thus, the writing as well as the reading of literature is likely to decline because of the poor standards of today's readers
The main idea of both the reading and the lecture are about the rate of reading literature. The reading asserts that declining the reading of literature causes some problems. On the other hand, the professor refuses this claim by saying that there are some specific reasons for this situation.
First of all, the reading asserts that by reading less literature, the society is missing out on important benefits. The lecturer, by contrasts, points out that there are some sort of books such as scientific books, history book, and political book that people read them; moreover, these books have high quality and well-written in comparison to literature book. furthermore; the aforementioned book provides the intellectual stimulation for the people. Therefore, it is not correct to assume that not reading the literature book mos harm the society.
Secondly, the passage mentions that changing from reading literature book to watch television, music video, or read on a web page has lowered the level of culture in general. The lecture, on the contrary, casts doubt on this claim by saying that reading less literature will not cause the lowering the culture's level. Moreover, he avers that there are many forms of information help society to improve their cultures directly instead of reading literature books. Therefore, assuming that not reading the literature book harms the level of culture is incorrect.
Eventually, the author of the reading asserts that declining in the reading of literature causes that publishers invest less money in literature and support fewer writers. The professor says that it is true that publisher will support fewer writers, but the reader should not be blamed because this situation is the fault of writers. Some of the literature books are difficult to understand and this lead to less reading these sort of books
- TPO 18 Integrated Writing Task 64
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing TaskJane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she loo 70
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sorts'?
Suggestion: sorts
...ntrasts, points out that there are some sort of books such as scientific books, hist...
^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...itten in comparison to literature book. furthermore; the aforementioned book provides the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: furthermore,
...itten in comparison to literature book. furthermore; the aforementioned book provides the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...this situation is the fault of writers. Some of the literature books are difficult to under...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...nderstand and this lead to less reading these sort of books
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in general, sort of, such as, first of all, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24161073826 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67972718679 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493288590604 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6283001208 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.54166306553 0.272083759551 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226204712093 0.0996497079465 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092340121133 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361811277294 0.162205337803 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414644845989 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.