TPO 12
The lecture mainly contradicts the author's arguments stating that the portrait resembles Jane Austen, the famous writer. The professor believed that the claim is questionable, and refutes each of the author's reasons, in detail.
Foremost, the reading states that Austin's family recognized the portrait as her. The professor, however, assesses this point by stating that the people who authorized the painting were not connected to her, as firmly as the author believes.
The professor mentions that Austin died 70 years before the incident, and the descendants could not be sure about Jane's appearance to illustrate his point. This plainly shows that none of them could see Austin's face.
According to the article, the portrait resembles the famous writer's face. In contract, the professor says that Austin's family was large; in fact, she had many relatives, whom the portrait can belong to. He concedes that the portrait Does look like Austin, but apparently, her relatives looked like her, as well, so the picture can belong to one of them.
According to the professor, many articles agree that the portrait belongs to Austin's relatives, and not her.
Finally, the author wraps his argument positioning that the style of the painting likes to a portrait painter, who was famous at the same time when Jane was a teenager. The professor argues that this claim is problematic; this is because the canvas used in this painting was sold much later. While the reading suggests that Humphry painted Austin's face; the professor, admitting that the style resembles Humphry's works, asserts that the canvas was only sold in England when Austin was around 27 years old, and not as young when compared to what the passage suggests.
To sum up, both the author and the professor hold conflicting ideas about the portrait's origin. They have trouble finding common ground about this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'portraits'' or 'portrait's'?
Suggestion: portraits'; portrait's
...fessor hold conflicting ideas about the portraits origin. They have trouble finding commo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, however, look, so, well, while, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16993464052 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4761755129 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8364352402 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248795299192 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873718878937 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609639743077 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113312760271 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562529085357 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.