The article states that the professional painting that portrait a teenage girl is Jane Austen and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that the girl could have been a member of Austen' family and he refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading avers that the Austen family has endorsed the claim that the girl in the portrait is Jane. Conversely, the porfessor disagrees with this point by stating that after 70 years of Jane death, her family gave the permission to use this portrait. Also, Austen family who recognize the girl in the portrait as Jane had never seen her before. Therefore, this claim does not prove anything.
Second, the article posits that the face in the portrait is clearly resemebles the one in Cassandra's sketch, Jane' sister who depicts Austen when she was an adult. The professor, on the other hand, explains that this subject in the portrait could have resembled one of Jane' relative either her cousin or their children.. Since she had an extending family, there are some opinions suggest that Jane's distant niece, her name marine, could have been depicted in this portrait and not Jane.
Third, the reading claims that the painting was painted when Austen was a teenager based on evidence, which is the style links to Ozias Humphrey lived during that time. Conversely, the professor refutes this point by saying that there is another evidence, such as a stamp on black Canvas, it clearly indicated it was sold by william lake. Lake did not seling Canvas in london during the period when Jane was a girl; However, hw started selling them when she was 27 year-old. As a result, this evidence clearly illustrates that the teenage in the portrait is not Jane Austen.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 73
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 61
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 61
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 71
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vers that the Austen family has endorsed the claim that the girl in the portrait ...
^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...tive either her cousin or their children.. Since she had an extending family, ther...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89152542373 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32264992447 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522033898305 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1498903682 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512201208221 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212032618824 0.0996497079465 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129428742728 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32528193993 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139849137215 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.