The reading and lecture both the discuss if the portrat represents Jane Austen or not. While the reading provides three reasons to support that portrat resemble Jane Austen, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that this is Austin's portarat because Austin's family gave permission to use this portarat after many decades of her death. On the other hand, the professor argues this notion by saying that it is hard to say that this portarat resembele Austin. This is becasue the family gave that permission many year after her deat. So, the author might not see her. As a result, we are not sure if it is Austin's image or not.
In addition, the article shows that the face of the painting is similar to the Cassandra's sketch. However, the professor rejects this idea by pointing out that Austin's relatives are very large. She has many cousins. So, this portrat may be resemble any on of her teenagers cousins. In addition, this painting similar to on of her neath called Marie. As a result, this portart could not be Austin.
Finaly, the reading mentions that the style of the picture is the same style of Humphery who is famous in the wealthy families. In addition, he was in the same period when Austin was teenage. Nevertheless, the professor questions this idea by explaining that this painting is only similar to Humphrey's style, but the stamp on the back sold by man called williom. Furthermore, Willim did not sell any stamps in London when Auston was teenages, but he started to sell stamps when she was tweenty seven years old. So, this is not Austin's painting.
- TPO 31 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- The lecture and the passage discuss about the limitation of archarology science. Although the passage claims that the archaeology science has been limited by few financial supporting, job positioning and new foundations to dig, The speaker refutes this id 3
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 85
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 81
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The reading and lecture both the discuss if the portrat represents Jane Austen ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e discuss if the portrat represents Jane Austen or not. While the reading provide...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'many years'.
Suggestion: many years
...becasue the family gave that permission many year after her deat. So, the author might no...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80141843972 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38613224301 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6900505402 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2222222222 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175913923194 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596901830425 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450896111913 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110611699592 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438853009422 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.