The reading and the lecture both about on fossils and the benefits or losses regarding their purchaser and its relation to the community. To begin with, the author believes that it should be easier for the the common people to determine the historic things in knowledge taken by the fossils. In contrast, the professor rebuts this argument. He thinks that it is so convenient for the community for purchasing this kind of fossils, like: schools, colleges and the libraries.
Secondly, The passage describes that if the fossils selling in private, its main correspond vulnerably lost by this process. While the teacher made claims on this statement. He states that it is impossible to believe that it must for every purchasing of fossil, there is period of being investigation by the scientist. So, this is not the matter of facts.
Lastly, the writer of the reading explains that value is made something precious and add more importance to that substance. When the fossil going to the unprofessional hands, there is many changing interrupt in this structure. The lecturer posits that damages may be made with the passage of time, scientist should not waste time on to, instead of, they can find the new one and get over on it because many of the fossils still remain undiscovered.
In conclusion, the reading passage describes the precious characteristics of the fossil, which is really getting change by placing it in a secrete place and for a basic purpose. On the other hand, the teacher made claims on the article by showing disagreement to the idea of the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...r believes that it should be easier for the the common people to determine the historic...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...r believes that it should be easier for the the common people to determine the historic...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...espond vulnerably lost by this process. While the teacher made claims on this stateme...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...disagreement to the idea of the author.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, may, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94716981132 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73745951299 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7340204242 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.846153846 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276956024312 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859325540281 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640606635596 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165053262013 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315918472999 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.