In the northwestern United states, forest fire and vigorous storm every year cause detrimental effect to the forest. According to the article, salvage logging helps to the economy and decrease the damage of the forest. In salvage, logging practice is clear the dead tree from the forest area and uses the wood lumber, plywood, and other wood products. Whereas, according to the lecture, salvage logging help to the recovering forest but the negative impact in long term.
Firstly, the passage claims that dead tree interrupt the growth of other trees and it takes a year for decomposing. Salvage logging provides the clear the area for new trees. In contrast, the lecturer mentions that clearing the area not guarantee to new tree growth. Decomposition of the tree gives the nutrition rich soil for future trees. If the remove the dead tree, so, lack of nutrition for the tree it cannot the survive.
Secondly, the author emphasizes that insect attracts the to decay wood such as spruce brak battle which is harm to other tree growth. Therefore, salvage logging helps to an eradication of the insect infestation and give healthy forest for trees. On the contrary, the speaker explains that spruce bark beetle lives in the more than 100 years in the forest but not any major damage to the forest trees. In fact, this insect prey for many birds. So, beneficial for both plants and insects.
Lastly, the passage implies that dead trees still usable for industries so, it can be the move by the worker of the local resident. Thus, help to both industrial and local people get the job. On the other hand, the professor states that large lumber wood take only by helicopter and it much expensive. The job is only temporary for local people. Besides, skilled people require than local people because of they are expert in a job.
- Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 60
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 78
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 75
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 73
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ack of nutrition for the tree it cannot the survive. Secondly, the author emphasizes that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...killed people require than local people because of they are expert in a job.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, in contrast, in fact, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84935897436 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35475296412 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3227314627 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6315789474 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4210526316 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.593259196769 0.272083759551 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168442053304 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783820401456 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33449502854 0.162205337803 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092655347016 0.0443174109184 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.