Both Reading and Listening discuss salvage logging. The article state that Forest are exposed by fire and severe stormncause a deal of damage every year. Article tells that advantage of salvage logging such as removing trees, protecting from forest from bark beetle and economic advantage of its. However, the speaker refutes each authour's reasons and provide severals explanations.
Firstly, the article claims that recoving of forest will take long time if dead tree remove. Removing dead tree makes forest fresh to growth immediately. And article also states that insects such as the spruce bark beetle like decaying woods. Removing decaying woods also will protect forest the danger of insect. However, The speaker refutes it by saying that cleaining forest does not necessary. the decay of trees and forest have significant importantance. It is important for soil. Salvage logging is more dangerous that insect and insects are also source of other animals. They are important for other animals.
Thirdly, the article posits that salvage logging is significant important in terms of local economy. Industires use forest for their production. A fire can be damage for these industries. Salvage logging make new job prostects. it create additional jobs. The speaker opposes this by saying that economic benefit of salvage logging is small and job prospect are also temproray.
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 60
- Imagine that you are preparing for a trip. You plan to be away from your home for a year. In addition to clothing and personal care items, you can take one additional thing. What would you take and why? Use specific reasons and details to support your cho 3
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require students to study many subjects in different fields rather than just their major 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...at cleaining forest does not necessary. the decay of trees and forest have signific...
^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cay of trees and forest have significant importantance. It is important for soil....
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sourced'.
Suggestion: sourced
...gerous that insect and insects are also source of other animals. They are important fo...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...Salvage logging make new job prostects. it create additional jobs. The speaker opp...
^^
Line 6, column 232, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...vage logging make new job prostects. it create additional jobs. The speaker opposes th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, third, thirdly, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52062820136 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564814814815 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8687578756 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.5789473684 110.228320801 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.3684210526 21.698381199 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516931081355 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149725251783 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681783612697 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33764987673 0.162205337803 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450689161843 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.97 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.