The reading states that salvage logging is a good way to remove dead trees from affected areas and provides three reasons of support it. However, the professor states that salvage logging has some damages for forests by stating some of important damages.
First, the article states that If the trees are not removed, they will take years to decompose. The professor says that it is nod good for the next generation of trees. He says that If the trees are not cleaned, they will be good for the next generation of trees. Also, he says that it will be useful for fertilizing th.
Second, the reading states that dead trees do more than just take up space. The professor says that it is bad for things which live near ther.
Third, the reading claims that salvage logging has economic benefits. The professor says that it is not good for economic. He says that it has not long-term impact on economic. He says that the remains of dead trees are cleaned by the helicopter. In addition, the professor emphisizes that it needs more experience than local residences have. So salvage logging is not good for improving local econimic.
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 60
- TPO 48- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70202020202 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32211765091 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 145.348785872 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479797979798 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.140004058 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.5 110.228320801 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32062648114 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120779790214 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672987027798 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208510350858 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546118679811 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.3589403974 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 12.2367328918 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 63.6247240618 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.