The reading passage states three reasons that the archaeologists faced in the United Kingdom. However, the lecturer disagrees with the writer by offering a new guide line proposed in 1990.
First, the writer suggests that some important artifacts were destroyed due to construction projects. However, the lecturer says that the new rule insisted that when a place is chosen to be built, researchers should exam and make sure that archaeologists are not interested in it. If this place is well worthy for archaeological research, the researchers should make a plan to preserve artifacts or document them before construction.
Second, the professor says that construction company is responsible to pay for archaeological development rather than the goverment.
Last but not the last, thanks to the preserving process, abundant jobs are released. The preserving process includes documenting data, processing information and writing reports. Therefore, lots of archaeologists do not have to worry about their career.
In conclusion, the lecturer provides a clear and strong evidence that contradicts to the reading passage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 169.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65088757396 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17948106166 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656804733728 0.540411800872 122% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2736310652 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182712210885 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627471514392 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416991784303 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800536326771 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540193194192 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.