In this set of the materials, the author of the reading passage expresses three reasons that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline. However, the professor thinks that the author’s theories contain some defects.
First of all, the author claims that human populations and settlements continue to expand, and it would cause the decrease of the bird populations that depend on these vanishing habitats. On the contrary, the professor indicates that urban development may cause some type of birds decrease, whereas, it will increase some species of birds. Because some city dweller birds such as pigeons and rodents will increase, it would raise up the numbers of falcons and cocks, which prey on pigeons and rodents.
In addition, the author states that the growth of agriculture will result in the destruction of bird habitats, hence, bird populations in rural areas will decline. However, the professor asserts that in the United States, there are fewer lands for agriculture activities due to introducing new crops technology. Thank to this new technology, per unit of yield of the new crops is increased. Therefore, it unnecessarily needs lands for agriculture.
Finally, the author raises the point that the use of chemical pesticides will influence the populations of birds due to pesticides to get into the water and into the food chain for birds where they can harm birds. On the other hand, the professor refutes the author’s idea by proposing that now, people are aware of the consequence of the pesticides will affect bird populations. Therefore, some people figure out two solutions. One is that new pesticides contain less poison than the past. Another is that growing more pest-resistance crops. It won’t harm birds at all.
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. In order to succeed, you should be more like others than be different from everyone else. 88
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 70
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 60
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82151367359 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534965034965 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1213290358 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478121464222 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142507700077 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13430476418 0.0662205650399 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266414357785 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807155663135 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.