The reading and lecture both discussed about torreya taxifoha extinction caused and solution. While the reading discussed the way of extinction and provide three supporting ways that help decline of torreya. However, the professor explains that this solution are not satisfactory and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading passage suggest reestablishment of torreya tree at same location where they live thousands of years. The professor also say that micro-climate is favorable for torreya's growth, this area is wetter and cooler than surrounding area. so scientists are try to plant torreya seed in this micro-climate. However, the professor refutes this point by say that global climate change caused the increase of micro climate area temperature and this are may be dry out.
In addition, the reading makes the makes argument torreya tree implanted different location where temperature more cooler. Scientists believes relocation of torreya tree are help them to survive. The professor refutes this suggestion by pointing out that relocation effect is unpredictable soem time if spreed very first and sometime it decline. Professor give an example of black local tree when relocated than it spreed very quickly the native species are declined.
Finally, the reading passage present an option to preserve torreya tree in research centers which will help to protect the species and conducting research. However, the professor refutes this option by pointing out that survival of species are inborn. Genetically they are used to any situation and research center are not going to help them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s growth, this area is wetter and cooler than surrounding area. so scientists are...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...tter and cooler than surrounding area. so scientists are try to plant torreya see...
^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'makes'' or 'make's'?
Suggestion: makes'; make's
.... In addition, the reading makes the makes argument torreya tree implanted differe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cooler' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cooler
...ed different location where temperature more cooler. Scientists believes relocation of torr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declines'?
Suggestion: declines
...me if spreed very first and sometime it decline. Professor give an example of black loc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
...irst and sometime it decline. Professor give an example of black local tree when rel...
^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt an option to preserve torreya tree in research centers which will help to prot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47222222222 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72182594645 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8843273953 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365944511849 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138701563065 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827921141467 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220455238326 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463920824932 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.