The article states that replacing " let it burn" policy with a policy of turn off the forest fires since it has a detrimental effect over huge areas and he provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the fire is a nature process of the ecological cycle not only destructive but also creative and he refutes all the author's reasons.
First, Yellowstone fires caused a huge damage to park's tree and vegetation, trees blackened from flames and smoke, and small plants also completely burned. The professor refutes this point, he states that vegetation scorched areas colonized by new plants, thus, the Yellowstone plants became more diverse. the areas of destroyed trees were taken for growing small plant which needs sunshade areas or growing plants which need exposing to high temperature.
Second, the park wild field was affected also, large animal as deer, and elk escape the fire. Many small species were unable to escape which leads destruction of the habitats and distribution of the food chain would make it is forbidden for the animal to return to survive. However, the professor says that the fire provides a new opportunity since small plants replaced the fired trees, provides ideal habitat for small animals to survive, and appear of some predators which depend on them for food that makes food chain become stronger.
Third, the reading claims that the fires unmask the value of the park as tourist visitors which had a negative impact on the local economy. Fires damaged several thousand acres of the park, as the result, the tourists decided to stay away from the park. The professor says that the claim is problematic; he explains that the fire is not happening every year. In 1988 there are many combination factors that lead to the fire such as, strong wind, and heavy rain. Fires were not be seen since 1988, therefore, it will not affect on the visitation of the tourists.
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- working in the same carrer as your parents 70
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO INTEGRATED 42 60
- TPO INTEGRATED 43 73
Essay evaluation report
vegetation scorched areas colonized by new plants
vegetation scorched areas are colonized by new plants
small plants replaced the fired trees, provides ideal habitat for small animals to survive,
small plants replacing the fired trees provide ideal habitat for small animals to survive,
the fires unmask the value of the park as tourist visitors which had a negative impact on the local economy.
the fires unmask the value of the park as tourist visitors had a negative impact on the local economy.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2 //you have issues on sentence structure.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 323 250
No. of Characters: 1559 1200
No. of Different Words: 177 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.239 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.827 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.327 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.917 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.447 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.375 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.61 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.154 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that replacing '...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... he refutes all the authors reasons. First, Yellowstone fires caused a huge d...
^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge damage'.
Suggestion: huge damage
... First, Yellowstone fires caused a huge damage to parks tree and vegetation, trees bla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...Yellowstone plants became more diverse. the areas of destroyed trees were taken for...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h need exposing to high temperature. Second, the park wild field was affected...
^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that makes food chain become stronger. Third, the reading claims that the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun combination seems to be countable; consider using: 'many combinations'.
Suggestion: many combinations
...happening every year. In 1988 there are many combination factors that lead to the fire such as, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 526, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...seen since 1988, therefore, it will not affect on the visitation of the tourists.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'thus', 'as to', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256198347107 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.165289256198 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0964187327824 0.0723426182421 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0413223140496 0.0435111971325 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0247933884298 0.0277247811725 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.104683195592 0.128828473217 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0275482093664 0.0370669169778 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.40761909484 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220385674931 0.0208969081088 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.112947658402 0.128158765124 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00550964187328 0.0158828679856 35% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0192837465565 0.0114777025283 168% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1957.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 324.0 271.125827815 120% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04012345679 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33950617284 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.231481481481 0.287516216867 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166666666667 0.187439937562 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0925925925926 0.113142543107 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40761909484 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.539623497131 107% => OK
Word variations: 63.6451565659 53.8517498576 118% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.9230769231 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9928862802 49.3711431718 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.538461538 132.220823453 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.878197800319 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.39072847682 236% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 48.0712250712 50.5018328374 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.67857142857 1.90840788429 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.755129953924 0.549887131256 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139512391166 0.142949733639 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0797353631745 0.0787303798458 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.634584446135 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.113255933212 0.139662658121 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.355865328558 0.266732575781 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127782561653 0.103435571967 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.345714554504 0.414875509568 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10385805764 0.0530846634433 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.515339774326 0.40443939384 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117828533023 0.0528353158467 223% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.