The passage and lecture both discuss three statements around a policy, which is dubbed "let it burn", and its effectiveness. The reading claims that "let it burn" policy has three significant damages and it can supersede with a new instruction to suppress forest fire as soon as possible. In contrast, the lecture explains that "let it burn" policy is not only destructive but also creative and demonstrates some counterarguments.
Firstly, the passage puts out that the forest fire in the summer of 1988 caused a huge damage to the vegetation and also remained behind a wasteland. The lecturer refutes this and mentions that the fire provided a new opportunity for plants to colonize and grow. For instance, in the scorch areas, the trees were replaced with the new smaller plants required open and unshaded space to grow. Plus, because of the high temperature some seeds gained the chance to germinate and become new plants.
Secondly, the text points that Yellowstone fire had negative effects on the wildlife and especially small animals. However, the professor says that the fire and new vegetations created a new habitant for other small animals such as hares and rabbits, and as a consequence their predators. Thus, the food chains became stronger compared to the past.
Thirdly, the article posits that Yellowstone fire harm tourist attraction, and so the local economy. The speaker opposes this and reminds that the forest fire can harm tourism if it happens every year. In fact, several factors are needed for beginning of a massive fire including low rainfall and strong winds. But, they are no any fire since 1988 in Yellowstone, and hence all visitors came back to the park next year.
Essay evaluation report
But, they are no any fire
But, there are no any fire
Sentence: For instance, in the scorch areas, the trees were replaced with the new smaller plants required open and unshaded space to grow.
Error: unshaded Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: However, the professor says that the fire and new vegetations created a new habitant for other small animals such as hares and rabbits, and as a consequence their predators.
Error: habitant Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 282 250
No. of Characters: 1377 1200
No. of Different Words: 168 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.098 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.883 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.577 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.012 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.33 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.58 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.076 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge damage'.
Suggestion: huge damage
...orest fire in the summer of 1988 caused a huge damage to the vegetation and also remained beh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ainfall and strong winds. But, they are no any fire since 1988 in Yellowstone, and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, in contrast, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7477510455 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2895044798 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346626553919 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106435913205 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516050684072 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180937958884 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293707959952 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.