The reading and the lecture both discuss three statement around a process which is genetic modification, defines as the change of an organism's genes. The reading states that there are myriad benefits of planting genetically modified trees on a large scale, and gives three reasons of support. However, the professor in the lecture argues that this is not as good as it first sound, and it may cause serious issues. The three measures made in the reading were refuted respectively by the lecture.
First, the article states that genetically modified trees are hardier and can survive more than unmodified counterparts. The professor in the lecture invalidates this point by explaining the fact that non modified trees are genetically diverse. Under certain environmental conditions, some trees will have high resistance and are able to survive. However, genetically modified trees are uniform in their composition, they die in harsh environmental situations, and thus are completely wiped out.
Second, the reading posits that genetically modified trees ensure some environmental benefits, by which they grow faster and with great returns. The professor opposed this point and states that genetically modified trees are more costly to plant. This is because the government charge farmers for seeds much more than non genetically modified plants. Moreover, the farmer cannot simply collect seeds and plant them whenever he likes, instead, he is obligated to pay the company, by law, every time he plants.
Finally, one more benefit was presented by the reading regarding genetically modified trees which is the prevention of over-exploitation of wild trees, by satisfying the demand for wood. The lecture refutes this point by stating that genetically modified trees cause more damage to local wild trees. Those grow aggressively and compete for nutrients and resources for the fact that they are usually planted among natural trees, thereby affecting their growth in a devastating manner.
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 83
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree:When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 80
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 58
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisms'' or 'organism's'?
Suggestion: organisms'; organism's
...dification, defines as the change of an organisms genes. The reading states that there ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46278317152 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80975115689 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537216828479 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5942937443 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491997645633 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185309636932 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108516386054 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31548172273 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840952028259 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.