Based on the reading material, it is stated that there are 3 viable benefits for planting genetically modified trees on a large scale. However, the lecturer finds this idea bereft of sufficient reasoning and presents some ideas to the contrary.
Initially, the author argued that genetically modified trees are designed to be harder than nature trees and as result, they can tolerate severe conditions more than wild trees. That being said, the lecturer repudiated this idea by clarifying that genetically modified trees are designed for one particular condition and it does not mean that they can survive in various situations. Thus, climate changes or insects infestations can wipe out genetically modified trees.
Another point mentioned by the author was that genetically modified trees bring a considerable number of economic benefits to farmers. That being said, the lecturer rejected this one too by stating that planting genetically modified trees has copious hidden costs farmers. They have to pay a plethora of money to companies, which produce the seeds of genetically modified trees, in order to buy seeds. Also by law, farmers have to pay money to companies every time in order to use their own tree's seeds.
The final point advanced in the reading passage was that genetically modified trees can be used in order to prevent over exploitation of wild trees. Yet again, the lecturer casted doubt on this idea. She said that planting genetically modified trees can cause more damages for nature trees. Genetically modified trees grow more aggressively than wild tress and if farmers plant them among the nature trees, they will compete with wild trees in order to get more sunlight, water and soil nutrients.
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 85
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 73
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 90
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... modified trees, in order to buy seeds. Also by law, farmers have to pay money to co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19784172662 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60213201833 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525179856115 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9168121627 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.153846154 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61538461538 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.541190603164 0.272083759551 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225023724232 0.0996497079465 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118830545547 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355640591673 0.162205337803 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100810269665 0.0443174109184 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.