The reading passage and the professor mainly discussed the genetic modification of the plants. The article states that genetic modification plants are benefited and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor mentioned that although the reading clime is true, it is also having serious problems and she opposed each of the author's opinions.
First, the article avers that genetically modified trees are harder the natural trees and they can tolerate diseases. The professor opposes this point by saying these are resistant to particular infections. He mentioned that when the virus spread in a specific geographic area the natural trees few might tolerate and survive but genetically modified trees wiped out completely because all are uniformly designed.
Second, the passage climes that it is benefited economically. The professor contended this point by saying there is a hidden cause behind it. He illustrated that the genetically modified tree seeds are more expensive than regular and the former should pay taxes to the company every time as per law.
Third, the article posits that technically modified plants prevent plant extinction and save the endanger and rare species. The professor cast a doubt on this point by saying it damage wildlife. He explained that the aggressive growth of modified plants competes with naturally grown planets for habitation 'as a result' it destroys the wildlife rather protection.
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 73
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 85
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 76
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 60
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little might'.
Suggestion: little might
...cific geographic area the natural trees few might tolerate and survive but genetically mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lants prevent plant extinction and save the endanger and rare species. The professor cast a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'damages'?
Suggestion: damages
...cast a doubt on this point by saying it damage wildlife. He explained that the aggress...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grown planets for habitation as a result it destroys the wildlife rather protecti...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...troys the wildlife rather protection.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46188340807 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68713530982 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600896860987 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6816379984 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302007513481 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100215599913 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099070424027 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172051093785 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859281267722 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.